This is quite different from when the first microprocessors and the first microcomputers appeared, certainly for me. I had a clear sense of where that technology was going and how it could have a positive impact on society. I don’t have that sense about GenAI. What I have seen is that others, when they are fully honest, don’t either. It is hard even to put a list together of what we don’t know. But a good start might be we don’t know:
We do know that GenAI has very positive potential benefits. At the same time we have a beginning sense of what the negative side effects are — see illustration below. We don't know if they can be eliminated.
Deep Fakes are not specifically called out in the illustration. Of course they are inherent in the social engineering cyberattacks shown. But they also have much more far reaching consequences. Deep Fakes have both positive and negative effects. Hallucinations are also a big problem, as is IP leakage. One other thing that is clear is that GenAI is not going to go away. Therefore, it is dangerous to ignore.
There are three stages of technology evolution:
With GenAI, we are currently in transition from Stage Two to Stage Three. It is difficult to predict how long a Stage Two to Three transition will take. In the case of the PC, it took a decade. For GenAI, Stage Two is the use of GenAI to enhance the browser function. Stage Three is unclear.
There has been talk about how autonomous vehicles would eliminate the jobs of long-haul truck drivers, and what effect that would have on society. This was before GenAI. We are possibly beginning to see the results of GenAI triggering improvements in productivity on a wider range of job types.