article
page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
The most conspicuous
examples of the strategic importance
of geographic breadth have been the
consolidation of much of the old Bell
System by AT&T and Verizon. The
“new” AT&T has tied
together the former regional incumbents
in the Southwest (SBC), Midwest (Ameritech),
Southeast (BellSouth), West Coast (PacBell),
as well as the backbone network of the
“old” AT&T and former
joint wireless venture (Cingular). Similarly,
Verizon has incorporated the network
assets of the regional LECs in the Northeast
(NYNEX) and Mid-Atlantic (Bell Atlantic),
as well as the long-distance and international
network of former MCI. Prior to the
post-bubble wave of consolidation, trans-regional
enterprises had to rely on one or more
regional LECs for access, an IXC for
long-haul services, and a cellular provider
for wireless services. Increasingly,
the surviving RBOC giants can do it
all.
What really
proves the rule is the activity
that has occurred further down
the dance card. Reacting to
the national strategies of the
top RBOCs, competitive carriers
in 2006 and 2007 have merged
with or acquired similar providers
to create supra-regional networks.
An early mover on this strategy
was Level 3,
which has acquired several regional
access providers in the East
and Southeast to complement
its existing backbone network,
a veritable “lite version”
of the RBOCs’ national
strategies. One Communications joined three carriers (Choice
One, Conversent, and CTC Communications)
into a network stretching from
the Northeast to Wisconsin and
Illinois, thus bridging the
Verizon and AT&T LEC territories.
Similarly, PAETEC,
a predominantly northeastern
carrier, merged with US LEC,
a southeastern CLEC, and recently
announced plans to buy McLeodUSA,
a carrier with operations in
20 states across the Midwest,
Southwest, and West. There are
other examples of comparable
import, and many more among
even smaller carriers.
As end-user demand for faster
wireline access continues to
grow exponentially and the rollout
of broadband wireless services
increases the bandwidth needed
for cell site backhaul, the
strain on backbone networks—and
costs for acquiring this transport
from other carriers—will
also increase significantly.
Providers that provide a given
service, whether wireline or
wireless, while minimizing third-party
expenses, will have a distinct
advantage. Future consolidation
is likely among all types of
competitive carriers and network
operators, and successful providers
will keep up with customers’
demand for on-net access within
a region or major national (and
international) commercial centers.
Dimension
4: Service Customization
The fourth
dimension of the telecommunications
market is customization,
|