|
By
Ed Gubbins
With the possible exception of “net neutrality,” “the cloud” is the most abused
technology buzzword of the last few years, applied to almost anything that
involves the internet. One of the more troublesome aspects of this phenomenon is
the way in which people often refer to “the cloud” as if it’s one thing. It’s
not. As cloud computing proliferates and is applied to ever more disparate
needs, it will be important for service providers to discern the various
segments of the markets and the very different service models that share this
term.
Start with what is perhaps the most
fundamental and immediate distinction
that must be made in any discussion of
cloud services: private vs. public. So-called “private clouds” – virtualized
environments within an enterprise’s
own dedicated data infrastructure –
are distinct enough from public clouds –
those provided by others using
infrastructure that is shared among
multiple customers -- that’s it’s difficult
to have a meaningful conversation
about “the cloud” without first
identifying which one of the two you
mean. It’s akin to talking about trends
|
|
A lot of enterprise adoption thus far has occurred from the bottom up. |
|
the rising stars of the cloud services
business, only began offering a
managed version of its offering in
December 2010. Though some cloud
services are gradually evolving in the
direction of managed services, much of
their early adoption has been driven by
the likes of Amazon and others with
little to no hand-holding of customers.
|
|
|
|
in the restaurant industry and those in
your own home kitchen in the same
breath; some of the technology may be
the same, but the business models and
surrounding concerns are night and
day. However, that important
distinction is somewhat muddied by the
fact that most enterprise cloud
adopters are taking a hybrid approach
– simultaneously developing public and
private clouds that, at any given stage,
may or may not be directly integrated
(at this stage in the technology’s
adoption, usually not).
Here’s another key distinction: cloud
computing (from here on, I’m talking
about the public kind) is sometimes a
managed service and sometimes not.
Rackspace Hosting, for example, one of
|
|
In fact, a lot of enterprise
adoption thus far has occurred from the bottom up, without enterprise CIOs
knowing about it. Employees need computing resources and don’t want to have to
beg IT managers for it, only to be denied because budgets are tight or delayed
by bureaucratic roadblocks. So they go to Amazon or Google and purchase IT
resources directly, over the web, with a credit card.
Over time, they start
talking to their coworkers about how well it went, and the company starts doing
more cloud computing. Then they start using it for more important tasks, which
requires more reliability and accountability – and in particular, more security.
So they begin to talk about the benefits of a more substantive, formal
relationship with a cloud provider, and they start asking about managed
services.
|
|
|