|  | 
  
      |  
 
          
            
              | 
                  
                    By
                    
                    
                    Ron de Lange
                   
We all know mobile data traffic is skyrocketing, fueled by the rampant use of smartphones, tablets, and compelling applications such as mobile video and social networking. And there is no slowdown in sight.
           
Operators know that their 3G networks are not equipped to manage this high level of traffic growth. They’re looking to all-Internet protocol (IP) networks such as long term evolution (LTE) and IP multimedia subsystem (IMS) to provide the bandwidth required to support data-hungry devices and applications and to cost effectively address the growing gap between traffic and revenue growth.
           
According to the Global mobile Supplier Association’s (GSA) recent report, 180 operators in 70 countries are currently investing in LTE, with at least 64 LTE networks anticipated to be in commercial service by the end of 2012. As LTE networks are deployed over the next few years, operators will be faced with a number of challenges as their networks become more complex, including scalability and cost management. Diameter can help address those challenges.
           |  | 
          
            
              | 
                  
                      | 3G networks are not equipped to manage this high level of traffic growth. |  |  
              |  
 
                  
                      |      
extensive use of Diameter protocol 
interfaces for LTE and IMS networks, 
but the organization has not defined a 
separate Diameter signaling 
infrastructure.
           
Without a separate Diameter signaling 
infrastructure at the network core to 
facilitate signaling between network 
elements, endpoints such as mobility 
management entities (MMEs) and home 
subscriber servers (HSSs) must utilize 
direct signaling connections to each 
other, forming a mesh-like network 
architecture. Network endpoints must 
handle all session-related tasks such
           |  |  |  
      |  |  
      |  
 
          
              | 
                   
    Why Diameter Signaling?
          
The majority of operators around the globe still connect their networks through the exchange of well-defined SS7 messages. As networks evolve, SS7 signaling is being replaced by Diameter and SIP-based equivalents. While LTE defines Diameter-based rather than SS7 interfaces, the majority of SS7 functionalities still have to be performed in LTE networks.
           
The Diameter protocol, using stream control transmission protocol (SCTP) for transport, is used widely in the all-IP, service-oriented IMS and LTE architectures. Within the IMS control and service planes, Diameter plays a central role in policy, charging, authentication, and mobility management.
          Diameter Routing Challenges 
The Third Generation Partnership 
Project (3GPP) has specified the
           |  |  
 
          
              | 
                      
          
            as routing, traffic management, 
            redundancy, and service 
            implementation. Initially, implementing 
            an IMS or LTE network without a 
            signaling core may be sufficient, but as 
            traffic levels grow, the lack of a capable 
            signaling infrastructure poses a 
            number of significant challenges, 
            including:
           
            Scalability: Each endpoint must maintain a separate SCTP association with
              each of its Diameter peers as well as the status of each, placing a heavy burden
              on the endpoints as the number of nodes grows.
            Congestion control: Diameter lacks the well-defined congestion control
              mechanisms found in other protocols such as SS7. For example, if an HSS has
              multiple Diameter front ends, the lack of sufficient congestion control
              increases the risk of a cascading HSS failure.              
 
 
 |  |  |