By Mark Nicholson and Adam Boone
Imagine yourself in a restaurant where the wait staff and the kitchen staff speak entirely different languages and cannot communicate with each other clearly.
You order the linguine with white clam sauce and some garlic bread from your waiter. The waiter brings you some clams … then a salad … then a piece of lasagna … then a handful of garlic … then a white sauce that the clams are supposed to be in. Then, two hours later, another salad arrives… then the linguine … finally, the bread that the garlic was supposed to be on ….
This would be an adventurous dining experience. You never know what might come to the table next and when it might arrive. Still, the restaurant is not going to make the Michelin guide any time soon.
A similar experience awaits the subscribers of IPTV, Triple Play and other advanced services if service providers fail to properly orchestrate connectivity in the applications and content it delivers. Like a bewildered restaurant patron whose order is confused and delayed, telecom subscribers will quickly switch loyalties and find a new service provider if the service experience does not meet their expectations. These subscribers now expect on-demand control, high responsiveness, and an appropriate quality-of-service for the applications they access.
The challenge of orchestrating connectivity and content calls for rethinking how services are fulfilled and managed must be overcome, and fresh look at the systems and processes that support these functions must be taken.
Content Counts … More Than Ever
Once upon a time, a service was simply connectivity – a T1, E1, DSL line, OC3, or some other physical or virtual pipe.
However, with rising competition and intense price pressures, connectivity has become commoditized, and service providers seeking to maximize margins are moving into application-based services, such as IPTV, VoIP, gaming, hosted applications, Software-as-a-Service and others. With this shift, a “service” now comprises both traditional connectivity, as well as one or more applications, and delivering and managing these new services means coordinating the various – and often complex – components that constitute each.
In our restaurant analogy, the wait staff is the network connectivity, bringing requests from dining room to kitchen and food (content) from kitchen to dining room. The kitchen staff represents the content delivery resources – IPTV servers, etc. If there is no clear coordination and orchestration between the wait staff and the kitchen staff, then patrons will make requests that may or may not be communicated in a clear and timely fashion to the kitchen. As a result, the wrong meal may be delivered, or the components of the meal may not be delivered in a sequence or timely manner that meets the patron’s expectations.
In the world of application-based services, if connectivity is not coordinated with the application and content, service providers run the same risk, potentially relegating content delivery to a “best effort” approach, for example, or requiring massive over-provisioning to achieve required service levels.
For facilities-based service providers, the result is a less than optimal utilization of the carrier’s most important strategic asset – the network. The fundamental operational challenge is for service providers to use this resource most efficiently and effectively, to meet or exceed subscriber expectations and