increase is such that the construction would be continuous. That’s not to say that wireless providers shouldn’t add more towers. They should, and quickly. However, other tactics are necessary to make the traffic more manageable.
Much more feasible solutions exist.
Service providers can undertake projects to offload their wireless traffic onto WiFi, spreading out the data-load. In addition, by employing 4G technology, providers can create more efficient networks that are able to crowd more bits onto the same amount of spectrum.
Furthermore, existing backhaul solutions can be made cheaper and more efficient by employing technology like Ethernet. Using Ethernet to carry the bits and bytes from the cell sites to the switching centers alleviates some of the congestion on the network in a way that’s cost-effective for the provider.
However, larger, more efficient networks are only part of the solution.
Operators also need to meet the challenge of increased data demand with business models that embrace the increase in demand, but also ensure that the heaviest users are carrying their fair load of the cost associated with providing them with the quality (and quantity) of service they demand.
Differential pricing may be the key to ensuring that premium levels of quantity and quality are available, but that those premium levels are charged for appropriately. That may mean that faster speeds and top-shelf QoS cost more. That may also mean that the time of day is taken into consideration in charging models, requiring those who demand massive bandwidth at peak times to pay more. ‘Best effort’ and off-peak offerings would cost less. Some consumers may be initially frustrated by such a charging model, but (assuming data users don’t get socialized into expecting low-cost, all-you-can-eat plans like many wired network customers have) wireless customers already expect to pay more for higher levels of usage, so tiered pricing for level of service is a natural progression.