Pipeline Publishing, Volume 4, Issue 8
This Month's Issue:
Serving Up Service Delivery
download article in pdf format
last page next page

Getting Real:
The State of Product Management

back to cover
article page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |

Ruzicka countered that “that's reining in the marketing guys. That's not reining in the engineers.” This gets to a deeper issue. The engineers will do what is necessary to solve a problem or meet a need, but have little cause to exceed their mandate. Marketing personnel often promise that which cannot be delivered. There must be a meeting of minds.

Margitta stated that one reason for the complexity is that “no one wants to compete on price.” Indeed, the quest for new customers in the telecom space is more likely to opt for more and better services rather than lower cost.

Ruzicka responded that there is some room for adjustment based on the target customer. “In every other business, there's a retail model and a custom model.” While retail models will do for the masses, some demand a different class of service. That requires customization. “If your organization is matrixed to consider that, you're ok.”

The Changing Role of Service Providers

Where do telecom operators go from here? Willets stated that there are basically two options: There's the retailing model, in which the potential revenue is all downstream, coming from subscribers. Conversely, a new model is emerging that involves upstream users paying for service through advertising and the like. That's the Telco 2.0 model. “If the value of your product goes to zero, how do you make a living?” The realities of the current market indicate that voice service may be just the sort of service that may drop in value to zero. How can telcos respond? “You might try to invent new products,” said Willetts. “So far, the telecommunications industry shows itself to be not quite good at that at all.”

Another idea is that the CSPs can stick to their core competency, which is enabling services to exist. That may, Willetts asserted, involve being the white-labeled communications inside someone else's product. The biggest device splash of the year tells just such a tale. “AT&T has positioned itself, I think rather unwittingly, as the 'intel inside' of iPhone. Unlike any other phone you'd buy from AT&T, which AT&T would activate and control, you buy an iPhone from the Apple store and take it home and activate it through iTunes. That makes Apple, effectively, an MVNO. Apple effectively becomes the service. It's just powered by AT&T.” Willets makes these points in order to raise the question of what the future of product management may look like, suggesting that “just as we get our arms around retail product management inside telcos, they might not be retail products at all for much longer.”

So why don't they package and sell these services to upstream users? “They don't even know these people are customers. They think Google's the enemy.”

Muderack responded, saying “That's certainly the cautionary tale for those telcos who don't get on top of product management.”

McNeice raised a point about Willetts's observations, wondering how his ideas of the changing roles of SPs squares with the oft-heard cry from SPs of “we don't want to be just a bitpipe.”

Willetts responded, saying “It's the way you take your punt. The telcos could remain bitpipes as one element of service, but could exploit their strengths as well. “Telcos are extremely good at payment and settlement for large numbers of small value transactions. Far better than credit card companies. Currently they just use it for their own services, but you could offer microbilling/micropayment settlement process for all manners of small value transactions.” Willetts continued, saying “ They run huge datacenters. They could offer hosting services.” Willetts also suggested that if Google or Facebook can find success monetizing user data, why can't telcos? “They know where you are, where your buddies are, if you're awake... There's a whole raft of service enabling products in there that are far more than just bit transport.” So why don't they package and sell these services to upstream users? “They don't even know these people are customers. They think Google's the enemy.” That leads Google to go around the telcos, potentially leaving the telcos without even bit transport. “My point is,” Willetts concluded, “that product management in a purely retail context may not be the best way of looking at this going forward. More and more of this product may be effectively wholesale aimed upstream in a white-labeling sense.”

Margitta underscored the challenges for telcos trying to compete with companies like Apple. “When the Apples come into the game, when they want to provision a new service, it's no longer this complex product management process they used to have. It's a software widget that can be deployed remotely. There's no big infrastructure hookup. No major testing process. No major overhead. All the reasons not to launch something are gone.”

Willetts carried this thought over to the other major example du jour, remarking that Google makes six major product releases per day. Six significant product changes. How are telcos to compete with that?

article page | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
last page back to top of page next page
 

© 2006, All information contained herein is the sole property of Pipeline Publishing, LLC. Pipeline Publishing LLC reserves all rights and privileges regarding
the use of this information. Any unauthorized use, such as copying, modifying, or reprinting, will be prosecuted under the fullest extent under the governing law.